Why do so many people dream of competing on a television game show? Is it for their 30 minutes in the spotlight, the ability to brag to friends and family, or the desire to prove to themselves that they can do it? Short answer: all of the above! But what really pushes hundreds of thousands of people to apply and go through rounds of castings and tests is the possibility of winning a lot of money.
If you’ve seen an episode of Jeopardy!, you know that the winnings can easily reach tens of thousands of dollars. The possibility of taking that money home is very enticing. There is just one catch: not everyone gets to take their winnings home. You have to be the lucky one to turn your hard-earned Jeopardy! cash into real-world dollars. Keep reading to find out why Jeopardy! contestants don’t always get to keep the money.
Why Don’t Jeopardy! Contestants Keep Their Winnings?
It might come as a surprise for many to learn that not all Jeopardy! contestants get to walk away with their winnings. The winner is determined by the amount of money they’ve won, which depends on the number of questions answered correctly. At the same time, the first and second runners-up often boast a handsome sum on their scoreboards too. Unfortunately for them, they do not get to take that money home.
There is a very specific and straightforward system on Jeopardy!. The winner of the game gets to play against two other contestants in the next game. Their winnings get transferred to the next episode, and they get a chance to win even more money. They still get to keep their winnings from the previous episode if they lose. And, if they win, they can take that money and continue to the next episode until they lose to another contestant (which could take quite a while, depending on the winner’s level of skill!).
The contestant that gets second place walks away with $2,000, which is not a bad consolation prize. The person in third place gets $1,000. The two players receive that money regardless of the size of their winnings. Come to think of it, it’s not a bad reward for going on the show and answering trivia questions in front of a live studio audience.
These are the rules for regular Jeopardy! episodes. The rules may differ in the case of a 2-way tie, a 3-way tie, or a special championship.
Now, the question is, why doesn’t Jeopardy! just pay everyone the amount that they earned? That sounds like a fair and reasonable system, doesn’t it? There is a very simple answer: it would cost way too much! Jeopardy! is a successful television game show that has been running for over 35 seasons. Even without the late host Alex Trebek, it continues to bring families together in front of the TV. Nevertheless, the winnings tend to be so large that they would probably go out of business after a few months of such generosity.
The Hypothetical Cost of Paying Everyone
The cost of paying everyone their winnings could make a significant dent in the show’s budget. Though there is the odd contestant that ends the episode with $100 in their bank, most have over a thousand by the end of the game. So, how much would it cost, exactly, to pay everyone? Let’s see.
Let’s look at the month of December 2022, from the 1st of the month until the 28th. By the end of each episode, the cumulative winnings of all three contestants average just above $40,000. I arrived at that number by adding up the winnings of all three contestants. I then found the sum of all the cumulative winnings for the past 20 episodes and divided it by 20 to find the average.
If every single player got their winnings at the end of these 20 episodes, that would set the show back $821,319. If, on the other hand, we stick to the current system and only pay the whole sum to the winner and give the runner-up $2,000 and the second runner-up $1,000, the show pays out $615,859 in winnings. That lands us at an approximate average of just above $30,000 per episode.
At only about $10,000 per day, the difference is not too grand. However, this money can add up to a significant sum through the years. Supposing the showrunners don’t want to pay everyone off because it would cost too much, they’re saving a decent amount per year. Perhaps there is a certain element of exclusivity that plays into it too. Only the winner will receive their winnings. Provided they exceed $2,000, it’s not a bad deal!
Final Words
Even though the runners-up don’t get to keep everything they’ve won, they still get a consolation prize, which is reassuring. This way, the winner gets to feel superior and experience all the joys of earning their money the hard way.
What do you think about this system? Should Jeopardy! give every contestant what they deserve (or what they’ve earned), or are they doing the contestants a favor by giving them any money at all? Knowing what you know now, would you still consider going on an episode of Jeopardy!? Why or why not?
And for more lessons in Jeopardy! history, check out our articles on why contestants always look to the left, if Jeopardy! has ever had wrong answers, and the show’s unique answering format. For more info on game show winnings, check out this article on whether or not Who Wants to Be a Millionaire is tax-free.
I probably would not compete on the show, regardless of the layout rules. For one, I would likely not be the winner as the skill level of the other contestants would probably be higher. The second reason is that I would probably stress out and not be able to answer the question correctly.
B.S.!!! With the large audience Jeopardy has, an average of $30,000 per show is small change to advertisers compared to other programs. The costs of the hosts, prizes, and other expenses of programs such as Wheel of Fortune, The Price is Right, et al., has to be far greater than Jeopardy yet they have no problem paying contestants what they earned.
If Jeopardy has 230 episodes per season and pays $30,000 per show to second and third place contestants, that would be $6.9 million per year. I don’t think I’d call that small change.
Ditto, Jeopardy must be raking in a fortune compared to wheel of fortune, which pays out considerably more to all contestants every evening,
Shows like Amazing Race are a winner takes all. In Amazing Race winner gets $1,000,000 and second and later all get zero. But during some episodes other contestants win prizes, often trips.
I am not watching Jeopardy anymore after learning this tonight. That is the height of cheapness. The second and third place contestants earned that money. They deserve it!
Haha. If you ever watched more than a couple episodes of Jeopardy you would KNOW that second and third place get $2,000 and $1,000 even if they earned less.
Soo. You aren’t “quitting” watching Jeopardy, you never were a viewer.
That the second & third place contestants even get money is a bonus as in game shows it’s usually winner takes all!
Everyone it seems has a good time & walks away with some sort of financial prize so it’s a “win win”
I have no problem with 2nd and 3rd. What I do Hate is that they call it cash wonnongs all the way up to the point its not cash anymore. Please, just call it Points, because saying someone is in 2nd place with $10,000.00 is deceiving.
Alex Trebek got $10M/yr. Now they are only paying Ken and Mayim $1M each per year. They also don’t pay for contestants travel and accommodations. I love Jepordy but they are cheap skates. The game show “Who wants to be a Millionaire” pays much more and the players have half the intelligence.
Why not follow wheel of fortune rules. Each player keeps their winnings and there is a minimum to other players. This is the Way it should be.
Actually the cost to Jeopardy might be higher than what was shown above if the contestants all got to keep their money. Reason being is that for the final question, the contestants might be more conservative and not bet as much knowing that their final amount would be $1,000.00 or$2,000.00 if they did not win.